[gawk-diffs] [SCM] gawk branch, master, updated. 104a4dbd6430d1b96dbf44601738c3652bcc85c9

[Arnold Robbins]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gawk".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  104a4dbd6430d1b96dbf44601738c3652bcc85c9 (commit)
      from  599e89596c2a813b084e40645d801eb1c7de1ee1 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gawk.git/commit/?id=104a4dbd6430d1b96dbf44601738c3652bcc85c9

commit 104a4dbd6430d1b96dbf44601738c3652bcc85c9
Author: Arnold D. Robbins <address@hidden>
Date:   Sun Oct 21 17:34:35 2012 +0200

    Update in FUTURES.

diff --git a/FUTURES b/FUTURES
index a6a6f3e..e511acb 100644
--- a/FUTURES
+++ b/FUTURES
@@ -33,9 +33,6 @@ For 4.1
        Consider making shadowed variables a warning and not
        a fatal warning when -lint=fatal
 
-       Consider making gawk output +nan for NaN values so that it
-       will accept its own output as input.
-
 For 4.2
 =======
        Think about how to generalize indirect access. Manuel Collado
@@ -86,3 +83,8 @@ Probably never:
 
        Add a lint check if the return value of a function is used but
        the function did not supply a value.
+
+       Consider making gawk output +nan for NaN values so that it
+       will accept its own output as input.
+               NOTE: Investigated this.  GLIBC formats NaN as '-nan'
+               and -NaN as 'nan'.  Dealing with this is not simple.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 FUTURES |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


hooks/post-receive
-- 
gawk