Re: [Gchemutils-main] The Gnome Chemistry Utils 0.9.90

[Jean Bréfort]

Previous patch did not work. This one should. Please test and tell me.

Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 19:04 +0200, Jean Bréfort a écrit :
> You might try attached patch and tell me if it works (not sure).
> 
> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 18:19 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> > Jean Bréfort pisze:
> > > Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 14:36 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> > >> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> > >>> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 12:25 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> > >>>> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> > >>>>> This is the first beta for the 0.10 releases. 
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> News are: 
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> CGhemPaint: 
> > >>>>>       * Fixed issues about residues management.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Gnome Crystal: 
> > >>>>>       * Add support for document properties.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> GChemTable: 
> > >>>>>       * Add Brazilian to known languages.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Other: 
> > >>>>>       * Fixed some build issues (Daniel Leidert).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Updated translation: fr.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Sources are at:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.bz2
> > >>>>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.gz
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> It's now time to test, and update existing translations (or add new
> > >>>>> ones). Before 0.10.0, I still need to update the applications
> > >>>>> documentation and write some more API docs.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>> Jean
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> I was trying to update the Fedora RPM to 0.10 and I have noticed that
> > >>>> the binaries and .desktop files (well, at least) contain -0.10 
> > >>>> suffixes.
> > >>>> Is this intended to stay like that?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Kindest regards,
> > >>>> Julian
> > >>>>
> > >>> Yes, it is wanted, so that different branches can be installed in
> > >>> parallel. Also links are created, i.e. gchempaint -> gchempaint-0.10.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Jean
> > >>>
> > >> Also, is a devel package still necessary? For 0.8 it contained include
> > >> files, pkgconfig file and api reference docs. None of these are
> > >> installed as of 0.9.90, so I guess the devel package can go away and .so
> > >> symlinks can go with the main package.
> > > 
> > > I confirm, no more devel package, at least until somebody request one.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Jean
> > > 
> > All right, almost there. It turned out that gchemutils does not build on
> > ppc (and probably ppc64). Tom Callaway suggested the attached fix, but
> > it still does not solve the problem completely. Build log is here:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=812065&name=build.log
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Julian
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gchemutils-main mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main

ppc.patch
Description: Text Data