[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Maxima] Fw: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl on ms windows
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Maxima] Fw: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl on ms windows |
Date: |
21 Mar 2002 21:06:52 -0500 |
Greetings!
Tim Pierce <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 11:13:11AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > "Mike Thomas" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > > I have found at least part of the trouble with the Mingw32 port of GCL
> > > > by
> > > > comparing the compilation methods for GCL and Maxima.
> > > >
> > > > The problem revolved around "cmpnew/cmpmain.c".
> > > >
> > > > Apparently twelve nulls had to be inserted between the compiler
> > > > generated
> > > > object code. I intend to test further to double check this as I am not
> > > > absolutely certain whether this is necessary. A further problem was
> > > > that
> >
> > This is rather odd. Perhaps it will become clearer when I can see the
> > changes you'd like to check in?
>
> I haven't been actively working on GCL for a few months, so please pardon
> me if this is already well known, but Bill Schelter's GCL 2.4.0 release
> did indeed require inserting twelve NUL characters into the object files,
> at least on some platforms. I'm not enough of a systems hacker to know
> why this was necessary, or under what circumstances.
>
> Just saying that Mike Thomas is not crazy for concluding that this
> was necessary. :-)
>
Thanks for the tip! How/where di you learn this, and which platforms
were affected? Any reasoning? Perhaps a 16 byte alignment issue?
Take care,
> --
> Mr. Frumble's pickle car is green!
> So is the spinach pouring from the spinach truck!
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- Re: [Maxima] Re: [Fw: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl on ms windows, (continued)