[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa
From: |
Matthew Wilcox |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 03:45:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:34:16PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> 1) This is what I thought. But gcl does this already for gc, and it
> definitely does not seem to be working on hppa. This same setjmp
> strategy is used successfully on all other Debian architectures to
> flush the registers to stack. Even the ia64 flushes its main stack
> successfully this way -- we had to add another special flush only for
> the ia64's *second* stack, which is unique to this arch, AFAICT.
ah. maybe you found a bug in our setjmp implementation? it's entirely
possible i got something wrong when implementing those.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
- [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, LaMont Jones, 2002/08/01
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/01
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, LaMont Jones, 2002/08/01
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/01
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, LaMont Jones, 2002/08/01
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/01
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa,
Matthew Wilcox <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Randolph Chung, 2002/08/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/12
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa, Camm Maguire, 2002/08/03