[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow |
Date: |
20 Nov 2002 12:01:59 -0500 |
Greetings, and thanks for your reply.
The relocation type is R_PPC_REL24. I've got the failure up now in
gdb and can backtrace into the bfd library if this would help.
Take care,
Breakpoint 1, mreloc_overflow (link_info=0x10846afc,
name=0x12754c59 "do_init", reloc_name=0x107fd95c "R_PPC_REL24", addend=0,
abfd=0x127493bc, section=0x1275b014, address=28) at sfaslbfd.c:138
138 printf("reloc for %s is overflowing\n",name);
(gdb) hello
Alan Modra <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:26:30PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings! On ppc, GCL loads binary object modules at specific
> > address in its lisp core, relocating them via a call to
> > bfd_get_relocated_section_contents. This works in general, but in
> > certain cases of many such loadings and a large base executable, the
> > routine reports that function symbols in the module overflow on
> > attempted relocation. I thought this was a TOC issue, and could be
> > addressed via -mminimal-toc, but no dice. All tests thus far with gcc
> > 2.95, but I'm inclined to think that 3.2 will be the same.
> >
> > Does this problem ring a bell (and hopefully a solution) with anyone?
>
> Relocation type?
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/19
- Message not available
- [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow,
Camm Maguire <=
- [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/11/20
- [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Geoff Keating, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Geoff Keating, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Geoff Keating, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Alan Modra, 2002/11/20