Re: [Gcl-devel] Additional structure tests added

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

Peter Wood <address@hidden> writes:

> On my version of GCL, a memory violation is a 'storage-condition', not
> an error, so the rt handler is not interfering with
> our_signal_handler(), and the process does not abort (I take this as
> another confirmation that my error condition patches were the right
> thing).
> 

I do think your general error handling approach is a great
improvement.  I've gone through your patch, and have separated out the
different threads I think are there.  But this is complicated a bit as
the patch you posted is greatly enlarged by your apparent down-casing
of all the code in a few files.  Could you supply a patch with only
the substantive changes in the diff?  If its too much trouble, don't
bother -- I'll get to it anyway.

Take care,


> The culprit is find-class, not typep (my #'typep does take class
> arguments, and most of the struct tests are passing).  For some
> reason, the defstruct form for struct-test-22 is not working properly
> with PCL's clos system.  I am in the process of trying to figure out
> what is going on.
> 
> I hope to report some progress on this soon.
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah