[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Build failing with --enable-ansi
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Build failing with --enable-ansi |
Date: |
13 Jan 2003 14:14:43 -0500 |
Greetings!
Yes, I am referring to your make-specializable 'hack'. I'd like to
know
1) Any other changes you had to make (i.e. value stack, changes to
make-specializable, ...
2) What the general aim of this 'hack' is. I still don't understand
what it is about our current typep, subtypep, and coerce which is
causing test errors.
Obviously, I haven't done my homework, but a quick explanation could
really save me some time, in case you have any :-).
Take care,
Peter Wood <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:00:22AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Hi Paul! Yes, I saw this, and it should now be fixed. You must have
> > caught the CVS update in between two rapid revisions last night. My
> > apologies.
> >
> > BTW, could either you or Peter elaborate on what is needed for typep,
> > subtypep, and coerce regarding the recent structure test failures? I
> > tried Peter's experimental fix, but it led to a value stack overflow.
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you mean the make-specializable hack? I have enlarged the value
> stack. Would you like me to post the whole thing? I assume you've
> fixed #'pcl::make-specializable itself.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Re: [Gcl-devel] Build failing with --enable-ansi, Peter Wood, 2003/01/13
Re: [Gcl-devel] Build failing with --enable-ansi, Paul F. Dietz, 2003/01/13