gcl-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Maxima] Make or defsystem


From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Maxima] Make or defsystem
Date: 02 Feb 2004 10:07:29 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Greetings!

Steve Haflich <address@hidden> writes:

> The question whether make or defsystem is better cannot be abstracted
> frmo the context.  I could well believe that make is superior in an
> environment where nondevelopers may need to (re)build the application
> from scratch.  But I believe defsystem and its cousins are more apt
> for developers, where desystem in the running development image can
> track what needs to be recompiled and reloaded, greatly reducing
> turnaround time during rapid development.
> 

This sounds pretty insightful.  Given this, perhaps the best would be
to define in defsystem, and have a lisp export facility to makefiles.
In today's opensource world, *many* non-experts/developers wind up
compiling their own programs.

Take care,

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]