[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value
From: |
Michael Koehne |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:06:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Moin Debian User,
^^^^^^^^^^^ please # vi /etc/passwd
:s/:Debian User:/:Dennis Decker Jensen:/
:wq!
would make replying simpler ;)
Moin Dennis Decker Jensen,
> Apparantly! I looked at the one place it is used, but could
> not figure out why it is needed.
> (defun load-time-value (obj) obj)
> (load "common-lisp-controller.lisp") ; or ~.o instead of ~.lisp
did I understand that right - is there any chance to get CLC with GCL
up and running, before Sarge becomes stable ?
Bye Michael
<kraehe> minion: chant
<minion> chant: MORE CODE! MORE CODE!
--
mailto:address@hidden UNA:+.? 'CED+2+:::Linux:2.4.22'UNZ+1'
http://www.xml-edifact.org/ CETERUM CENSEO WINDOWS ESSE DELENDAM
- [Gcl-devel] system, load-time-value, Debian User, 2004/02/06
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/11
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Debian User, 2004/02/13
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/13
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Mike Thomas, 2004/02/16
- [Gcl-devel] packages & exported symbols (was: system, load-time-value), Debian User, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] packages & exported symbols (was: system, load-time-value), Camm Maguire, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/16
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Debian User, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value,
Michael Koehne <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Dennis Decker Jensen, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Michael Koehne, 2004/02/17
[Gcl-devel] SGC and file I/O, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/11
[Gcl-devel] Runtime SGC fault address recovery tests, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/11