[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: GCL vs. Fedora
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: GCL vs. Fedora |
Date: |
06 Mar 2004 20:29:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings, and thanks for your note!
Recent 2.6.1 or 2.7.0 should automatically add -Wa,--execstack to your
CFLAGS, which I thought would take care of the problem. Could you
please confirm/refute? Not the case with 2.5.3.
Take care,
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm:
>
> I'm bringing up ACL2, and in consequence GCL. Wondering if the fedora
> build issues were ever resolved.
>
> My current status is that if I disable exec-shield via the /proc
> interface I can get both gcl-2.5.3 and Debian's gcl-2.6.1 to build.
> Curiously, I cannot get 2.6.1 to build using
>
> setarch i386 make
>
> I just tried to build gcl-2.5.3 using setarch i386 make and that seems
> to have worked, but I'm not convinced that dump-lisp will work so I'm
> concerned about how easily I'm going to be able to proceed with ACL2.
>
> Has a solution been resolved for this at this point? If so, is there a
> patch I can grab?
>
> BTW, I'll be happy to provide a rpm spec file if that is helpful.
>
> shap
> --
> Jonathan S. Shapiro <address@hidden>
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] Re: GCL vs. Fedora,
Camm Maguire <=