[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL
From: |
Mike Thomas |
Subject: |
RE: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 10:17:35 +1000 |
Hi Camm.
Thanks for the idea.
| /* setjmp does not lay down the other register windows registers,
| and so we must recurse some to make sure that all registers are
| forced onto the stack.
| */
| #define N_RECURSION_REQD 8
|
| You might try increasing this just for interest sake. In fact, I
| might also on hppa, where all opts greater than -O0 prevent an acl2
| build with very similar filename corrpution symptoms. In you case,
| though, we see this with -g only, so this expalnation does not look
| likely.
And your expectation has been fulfilled. I'm pursuing the idea that it
might be a simple field overwrite by more careful insertion of dummy struct
fields.
Cheers
Mike Thomas.
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL, (continued)
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL, David MENTRE, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/05/25
- [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/05/26
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Mike Thomas, 2004/05/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/05/27
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Mike Thomas, 2004/05/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/05/29
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2, Magnus Henoch, 2004/05/29
Re: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL, Camm Maguire, 2004/05/11
Re: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL, Camm Maguire, 2004/05/11
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Gcc 3.4 and GCL,
Mike Thomas <=