Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures

[Camm Maguire]

Hi Paul!  Thanks again aas always.  Should be ready for another trial
now.

Take care,

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Thanks again!  As you can tell, I'm trying to save on the
> > pre-evaluations if possible.  Simplest would be to pull all args into
> > a let*, but ...
> > I think this is fixed now, but would always appreciate your comment.
> > This version pre-evaluates in a let* all a) cons args whose car is not
> > 'quote, and b) non-constant atom args which appear anywhere to the
> > right (at any nesting level).  This should work, right?
> 
> There's a new problem:
> 
> Test MISC.450 failed
> Form: (FUNCALL (COMPILE NIL
>                          '(LAMBDA (A B)
>                             (MIN 0 (REDUCE #'MIN (VECTOR A B 0)) 0)))
>                 -10 -1)
> Expected value: -10
> Actual value: #<CONDITIONS::INTERNAL-UNBOUND-VARIABLE.2>.
> 
>       Paul
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah