Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures

[Camm Maguire]

Thanks!  OK, a retreat to a yet more conservative position.  What is
committed now passed 2k random-tester iterations for me.

At some point we need to make use of compiler detection of
side-effects in functions.  The hooks are there already.

Take care,

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> 
> > Hi Paul!  Thanks again aas always.  Should be ready for another trial
> > now.
> 
> Failure is less frequent, but I saw this:
> 
> Test MISC.451 failed
> Form: (funcall (compile nil
>                          '(lambda (a b)
>                             (flet ((%f3 () (setq a -2210)))
>                               (logxor a b (%f3)))))
>                 -22650 20595)
> Expected value: 171
> Actual value: 20595.
> 
> (this test has been committed.)
> 
>       Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah