Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures

[Paul F. Dietz]

Camm Maguire wrote:
> Thanks!  OK, a retreat to a yet more conservative position.  What is
> committed now passed 2k random-tester iterations for me.

But not, unfortunately, for me:

Test MISC.453 failed
Form: (funcall (compile nil
                        '(lambda (a) (* a (setf a 2) a (identity 5))))
               3)
Expected value: 60
Actual value: 90.

I have some local changes to my copy of the random tester that may be
improving its detection rate.  I can probably boost it more by making
SETQ/F and n-ary arithmetic operators more likely.

        Paul