[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures
From: |
Mike Thomas |
Subject: |
RE: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:57:18 +1000 |
Hi Camm.
You wrote to Paul:
| Interesting -- I had thought we'd hit gcl memory limits far before
| gcc.
after he wrote:
| > I'm seeing something odd in gcl's compiler. It's producing C
| > files that are causing the C compiler to use very large amounts
| > of memory (> 800 MB in some cases), causing my machine to thrash.
| > I'll send you an example of such a C file in the next message
| > (it's 1.7 MB, so I will gzip it first; I don't have the associated
| > lisp.)
| >
| > The file contains a function with a huge tree of nested conditional
| > expressions. This must be what is causing the compiler to take
| > so long.
On a related note, On Windows I have random tester failures for (10,000 8)
because the GNU assembler (from memory - this was a few months ago) crashes
on the large files generated.
Cheers
Mike Thomas.
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, (continued)
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- RE: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures,
Mike Thomas <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/30
Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27