[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: address@hidden: RE: Compiling gcl on Fedora Core 3.]
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: address@hidden: RE: Compiling gcl on Fedora Core 3.] |
Date: |
04 Jan 2005 09:35:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings!
Matt Kaufmann <address@hidden> writes:
> Thank you, Camm. Do you mind if I forward your reply to acl2-help? (In the
> meantime I'm adding previous contributors to this thread.)
>
Sure, please feel free to forwward.
> I'm not aware of any problems that need correcting from 2.6.5 other than the
> one discussed in this thread, but thank you for asking. Hmmm, except well,
> actually, you built a reader patch for me some time ago that allows putting a
> package prefix in front of an arbitrary s-expression, not just a symbol. But
> 2.6.5 doesn't have this patch:
>
> >'lisp::(a b)
>
> LISP::||
>
> >
> Error: The function A is undefined.
> Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging
> Error signalled by EVAL.
> Broken at EVAL. Type :H for Help.
> >>
>
> Currently our AMD work cannot use GCL because we rely on this capability.
> (Allegro CL is working OK, so this isn't at all critical for us, but it would
> be nice to have GCL as an option.)
OK, this will not be a problem. I'm wondering if we could make it an
option selectable by configure -- thoughts? This would be less likely
to degrade the heavy amount of testing that has gone into 2.6.
Take care,
>
> Thanks --
> -- Matt
> cc: address@hidden
> From: Camm Maguire <address@hidden>
> Date: 27 Dec 2004 20:34:44 -0500
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0
> X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-332 required=180
>
> Greetings! I believe this is due to a newer version of binutils
> available on FC3. Patches are available on the website errata page.
> Alternatively, one can build with GCL's local binutils copy via
> --disable-statsysbfd --enable-locbfd. Of course there are no real
> details below, so this is just an educated guess. Please advise if
> problems persist.
>
> BTW, am considering rolling the errata page patches plus a few minor
> changes for axiom into a 2.6.6. If you have any other suggestions of
> minimal changes which should go in I'd be most appreciative. Major
> work these days is confined to cvs head (aka 2.7.0).
>
> Take care,
>
> Matt Kaufmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi, Camm --
> >
> > If you know anything about this, please feel free to enlighten us!
> >
> > Thanks --
> > -- Matt
> > From: "David L. Rager" <address@hidden>
> > Subject: RE: Compiling gcl on Fedora Core 3.
> > To: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:38:00 -0600
> > Reply-To: address@hidden
> >
> > Hello Sandip,
> >
> > I too tried for a couple hours to get this to work. Please let me know
> > if you figure it out. For the moment, I gave up and went with the
> > prebuilt image of gcl that I found in an rpm at an obscure website.
> >
> > The filename is: gcl-2.6.5-0.fdr.1.2.i386.rpm.
> > A website that has it is
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/yum/fedora/2/RPMS.stable/
> >
> > The same person that compiles GCL for these images already has some
> > images for other Fedora 3 programs, so maybe he is also running into
> > problems with compiling GCL on Fedora 3.
> >
> > Once you get a version of GCL working could you please let me know if
> > you get ACL2 building successfully? I had to download a prebuilt image
> > of that too, but I haven't spent a huge amount of time on it (and I am a
> > Newb in terms of Fedora Linux file system arrangement).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> > - -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Sandip Ray
> > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 10:47 AM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Compiling gcl on Fedora Core 3.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to compile gcl 2.6.5 on Fedora Core 3, and I am running
> > into
> > errors. I am not sure what I need to do so I was thinking if someone
> > over
> > here can help me. I am attaching the complete log of the run of make
> > with
> > this email.
> >
> > I admit I am a complete newbie in this, but the couple of times I had
> > tried it before it worked without any problems.
> >
> > Interestingly, the pre-built ACL2 image for Debian works perfectly for
> > my system. In case this is relevant, the gcc version in my machine is
> > 3.4.2.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Sandip.
> > ----------
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Camm Maguire address@hidden
> ==========================================================================
> "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah