[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Performance complaint from a user
From: |
jeff |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Performance complaint from a user |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:46:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 |
Quoting Juho Snellman <address@hidden>:
> ... Either way it means that when
> porting code to SBCL it's easy to see where to add those crucial
> few declarations to speed the code up, while with GCL I find it
> nearly impossible. DISASSEMBLE seems to always return NIL, and thus
> can't be used for checking whether all the generic ops got optimized
> out.
It at least used to be possible to get GCL to keep the C file
the compiler made.
In GCL 2.6.2 (which I just tried), disassemble works on functions
that have NOT been compiled and gives both the C code and the
assembly language code.
-- Jeff
Re: [Gcl-devel] Performance complaint from a user, Camm Maguire, 2005/08/29