Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: subtypep issues

[Camm Maguire]

Greetimgs!  Just another followup here:

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> > Whoops, I made a mistake reading the page for simple-array.  Yes,
> > you're right, you can do that.
> 
> I want to add that you may not *want* to do it, if it forces
> array operations to be slow even if the program has a simple-array
> declaration.
> 

I think the spec indicates that simple-vector should be (simple-array
* ...), not (simple-array t ...).  type-of.1 requires this, but the
following then fail:

  CL-TEST::SIMPLE-VECTOR-IS-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY.1, 
   CL-TEST::SIMPLE-VECTOR-IS-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY.3, 
   CL-TEST::SIMPLE-VECTOR-IS-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY.5, 
   CL-TEST::STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, 
   CL-TEST::BASE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, 
   CL-TEST::SIMPLE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, 
   CL-TEST::SIMPLE-BASE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, 
   CL-TEST::BIT-VECTOR-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, 
   CL-TEST::SIMPLE-BIT-VECTOR-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR.

Take care,


>       Paul
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah