[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] difficulties with, with-standard-io and defpackage

From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] difficulties with, with-standard-io and defpackage
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:09:19 -0500
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigory ōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

Greetings!  Again, I think you want the ansi image.  We support the
older CLtL1 image for applications that have used it for years.

GCL_ANSI=t gclcvs
GCL (GNU Common Lisp)  2.7.0 ANSI    Jan 26 2007 00:48:46
Source License: LGPL(gcl,gmp,pargcl), GPL(unexec,bfd,xgcl)
Binary License:  GPL due to GPL'ed components: (XGCL READLINE BFD UNEXEC)
Modifications of this banner must retain notice of a compatible license
Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter

Use (help) to get some basic information on how to use GCL.

Temporary directory for compiler files set to /tmp/

>(find-symbol "WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX")


>(fboundp (find-symbol "WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX"))


>(symbol-function (find-symbol "WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX"))

(MACRO . #<compiled-function WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX>)


Please let me know if problems persist.

Take care,
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah
sorry, yes I do mean WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX.

On 2/18/07, Paul F. Dietz <address@hidden> wrote:


WITH-STANDARD-IO is not in the standard.


Jeff wrote:

> Hi,
> I recently started using gcl to learn common lisp, but ran into a
> problem or two.
> If I'm not mistaken, with-standard-io does not appear to be in the
> 2.6.7 release, I get the message "Error: The function WITH-STANDARD-IO
> is undefined".
> I initially tried the latest cvs, but that wouldn't build, so I
> checked out a slightly older one, using cvs's -D option, plucked a
> date out of the air, 20070101.
> This built ok, and with-standard-io works, but defpackage appears to
> be undefined.
> I've grown quite fond of gcl, despite these recent difficulties, could
> perhaps one of the maintainers advise on the status of these things
> (assuming I haven't got this all wrong).
> Thank you
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]