[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:54:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Greetings! You can see the gcc flags emitted with
(trace si::system)
I think the current behavior is
(proclaim '(optimize debug))
Warning:
The OPTIMIZE quality DEBUG is unknown.
NIL
in 2.6.8 and a no-op in 2.7.0, though it should be fixed in the
latter.
Take care,
Gabriel Dos Reis <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire <address@hidden> writes:
>
> | Greetings! I suspect a missing signal block around some code that
> | needs protecting. I've reprodced under gdb, but there are no
> | debugging symbols in the image. [ Question for list -- have computers
> | now become so fast that -g should be included by default in all gcl
> | images? It used to slow down the compiler, don't know about now. It
> | does make the image quite a bit bigger. ]
>
> I'm not sure what it the relation between -g and
>
> (proclaim '(optimize debug))
>
> but I can report that with GCL-based OpenAxiom, the build is really
> slow and the resulting system runs very slow, even on my fastest
> quad-core machines.
>
> -- Gaby
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL,
Camm Maguire <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2009/02/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] GCC 4.4 and strict aliasing, Camm Maguire, 2009/02/26
Message not available