[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?
From: |
J. David Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ? |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2019 13:14:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (cygwin) |
Anton Ertl
<address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 30. April 2019, 17:12:34 CEST schrieb Anton Ertl:
>> > What do you think should be the default for .S and ~~: the classic or
>> > the smart .S ?
>>
>> The question on today's net2o chat resulted in 3 votes against the smart .S
>> by
>> default.
>
> The same here and on comp.lang.forth. So I guess that we will revert
> .S to be classic.
>
>> In ~~ it's a different question, because in ~~ you can't just type in
>> something else to get that something else.
>
> I also think that ~~ should use the smart .S .
>
> - anton
I don't see anything wrong with ~~ using smart .S. I just don't want .S to
return something that no one that is used to the real .S will expect...