[gfsd]Re: request for new mailing list: bug-cppi

[Jim Meyering]

"Bradley M. Kuhn" <address@hidden> wrote:
| Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
|
| > RMS already knows about and approved it.  See below.
| > The copyright assignment is on file, too.
|
| The question is, though, should we make it part of indent (as RMS suggests),
| and have bug-cppi and bug-indent go to the same place?
|
| Could you perhaps coordinate with the maintainer of indent to both maintain
| your parts, and share the job with the overall indent maintainer?

I'd rather keep cppi separate.
I barely have the time to prepare for the release,
so the hassles/time required to integrate it into another package
would be prohibitive for me.