gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS Benchmarks


From: Jon Ursenbach
Subject: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS Benchmarks
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:56:54 -0700

We serve out quite a lot of images everyday via our IFrame (online
"adult" dating company), and over the past two days we've been running
our own in-house file storage system (a replacement for the horribly
documented, and terribly buggy MogileFS), and it looks like we're
going to end up sticking with NFS.

We ran 100 terminal instances doing writes in one test, and reads in another.
- 2k writes, one at a time in each instance, averaged from 0.5 to 5 seconds.
- 2k reads, again one at a time, averaged from 0.10 to 2 seconds.

I don't have a _complete_ log of my tests, but here's a very small
portion of the last read test I conducted:

/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3307_thumb.jpg  1.38440608978
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3399_full.jpg  1.51509380341
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3393_thumb.jpg  0.752840042114
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3381_thumb.jpg  1.84753394127
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3444_thumb.jpg  2.16324305534
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3283_full.jpg  2.13876509666
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3337_full.jpg  1.30814599991
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3423_thumb.jpg  1.22093510628
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3372_thumb.jpg  1.3562169075
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3358_full.jpg  1.38488101959
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3418_full.jpg  1.2317378521
/data/hashtest/0/25_IMG_3356_full.jpg  2.0598461628
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3437_full.jpg  1.93640899658
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3322_full.jpg  1.55558204651
/data/hashtest/0/31_IMG_3329_full.jpg  2.05298900604
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3376_thumb.jpg  1.09549021721
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3443_thumb.jpg  1.72550582886
/data/hashtest/0/25_IMG_3320_full.jpg  1.33485102654
/data/hashtest/0/25_IMG_3362_thumb.jpg  1.07689189911
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3319_full.jpg  1.78225803375
/data/hashtest/0/24_IMG_3422_thumb.jpg  1.41833090782
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3418_thumb.jpg  0.853131055832
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3481_full.jpg  1.51521205902
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3419_thumb.jpg  1.88594007492
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3333_thumb.jpg  1.11501097679
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3464_full.jpg  1.73386716843
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3329_thumb.jpg  0.14195895195
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3349_full.jpg  0.453220129013
/data/hashtest/0/24_IMG_3399_thumb.jpg  0.319472074509
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3357_thumb.jpg  0.184777975082
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3318_thumb.jpg  0.200763940811
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3349_thumb.jpg  0.217283010483
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3465_full.jpg  0.357889890671
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3434_full.jpg  0.686009883881
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3415_full.jpg  0.468312978745
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3325_thumb.jpg  0.15156006813
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3345_thumb.jpg  0.261151075363
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3481_thumb.jpg  0.219217061996
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3338_full.jpg  0.488296985626
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3360_full.jpg  0.263535022736
/data/hashtest/0/24_IMG_3371_thumb.jpg  0.23340010643
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3396_thumb.jpg  0.272875070572
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3402_thumb.jpg  0.241803884506
/data/hashtest/0/24_IMG_3337_thumb.jpg  0.191148042679
/data/hashtest/0/24_IMG_3335_thumb.jpg  0.410676956177
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3387_full.jpg  0.310095071793
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3405_thumb.jpg  0.165282964706
/data/hashtest/0/26_IMG_3429_full.jpg  0.305140018463
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3349_thumb.jpg  0.158540010452
/data/hashtest/0/22_IMG_3337_thumb.jpg  0.422141075134
/data/hashtest/0/29_IMG_3358_thumb.jpg  0.363726854324
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3396_full.jpg  0.286473035812
/data/hashtest/0/28_IMG_3406_full.jpg  0.244587898254
/data/hashtest/0/27_IMG_3454_thumb.jpg  0.144367218018
/data/hashtest/0/24_IMG_3413_full.jpg  0.253911018372

GlusterFS shows a lot of promise, but right now I its current version
I don't feel that it's fast enough for us to serve out images.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]