Re: [Gluster-devel] namespace cache

[DeeDee Park]

Just a quick question. Will glusterfs work on file systems that don't 
support inodes? I don't know much about the Windows NTFS details, but will 
glusterfs eventually work there or only targeted to work on the unix file 
systems? A few people have told me that they would use glusterfs to utilize 
free disk space on the windows office desktops as additional storage bricks. 
I'm using VMware player to currently create a unix virtual server within 
Windows to do this. Eventually I would like to have a simpler solution and 
have an agent work directly on the Win platform.


> From: "Amar S. Tumballi" <address@hidden>
> To: "Brent A Nelson" <address@hidden>
> CC: Gluster Developers List <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] namespace cache
> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 05:30:55 +0530
>
> Let me tell how inode is propagated through each translator. Hope many may
> want to know.
>
> All the translators which has just one child nodes
> (!(unify,afr,stripe,client-protocol,posix)) send the inode number passed by
> the child volume to the upper layer. Hope that makes sense. Now, let me
> explain each of these translators.
>
> * posix - sends the inode number of the file/directory from actual file
> system.
>
> * client-protocol - sends inode number it got from the server to upper
> layer.
>
> * stripe - sends the inode number of the first child all the time (as 
> stripe
> needs first child node to be up all the time) to above layer.
>
> * afr - sends the inode number of first available (in the order specified 
> in
> 'subvolumes' option) child node to above layer.
>
> * unify - always sends the inode number got from the namespace child.
>
> So, if one uses the afr, it has a chance when a afr'ed namespace is down, 
> it
> gets different inode number from unify.
>
> -bulde
>
> On 7/4/07, Brent A Nelson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Does this work even if the namespace volume is an AFR?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brent
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
> >
> > > Yes sir!
> > > The namespace cache gives persistant inodes accross mount/reboots. (If
> > > namespace data is not deleted in backend).
> > >
> > > -bulde
> > >
> > > On 7/4/07, Dale Dude <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Are you guys using the namespace cache for the inodes as well? Like
> > >> unionfs 2.0 ODF release does? Seems their method removes inode
> > >> collisions/loss and makes it easier for inode consistancy (inodes are
> > >> now permanent).
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Dale
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> > >> address@hidden
> > >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Amar Tumballi
> > > http://amar.80x25.org
> > > [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Amar Tumballi
> http://amar.80x25.org
> [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_________________________________________________________________
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507