Re: [Gluster-devel] NFS reexport still a little glitchy

[Anand Avati]

Brent,
the afr's logging in this case are harmless, but we fix the logging
priorities soon. I'm not sure about the NFS rexport hanging. I will try to
reproduce it at my setup. If the issue with cp -a failing was related to
hardlinks, please try patch-371 which has some hardlink related fixes in it.

thanks,
avati

2007/7/26, Brent A Nelson <address@hidden>:
> I've been testing NFS reexport with cp -pr (from a Sun) of a /usr
> directory from GlusterFS to GlusterFS.  So far, it's been close, but not
> quite right.  The copies never turn out the same, there's always at least
> some missing files.  The cp reports "cannot access" for a lot of items.
> GlusterFS logs a ton of op_ret=-1 op_errno=61 errors such as the
> following:
>
> 2007-07-25 14:36:43 E [afr.c:1234:afr_selfheal_getxattr_cbk] mirror2:
> (path=/nfs2/share/zoneinfo/right/Pacific/Johnston child=share2-1)
> op_ret=-1 op_errno=61
> 2007-07-25 14:36:43 E [afr.c:1234:afr_selfheal_getxattr_cbk] ns0:
> (path=/nfs2/share/zoneinfo/right/Pacific/Johnston child=ns0-0) op_ret=-1
> op_errno=61
> 2007-07-25 14:36:43 E [afr.c:1234:afr_selfheal_getxattr_cbk] ns0:
> (path=/nfs2/share/zoneinfo/right/Pacific/Johnston child=ns0-1) op_ret=-1
> op_errno=61
>
> In my tests from today's TLA repository, nfsd is eventually even hanging
> (this wasn't occurring in earlier patch releases).  Following that, I did
> an ls from the GlusterFS reexport machine of one of the areas that the NFS
> client recently complained about and got a similar error, but in a
> different function:
>
> 2007-07-25 15:51:10 E [afr.c:563:afr_getxattr_cbk] mirror4:
> (path=/usr/share/dict child=share4-0) op_ret=-1 op_errno=61
> 2007-07-25 15:51:10 E [afr.c:563:afr_getxattr_cbk] mirror4:
> (path=/usr/share child=share4-0) op_ret=-1 op_errno=61
>
> I'm hoping the errors provide some clue to the NFS glitches (and
> presumably pins the issue down to AFR), but perhaps they're harmless.
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent
>
> PS An NFS reexport from an extremely simple (no protocol/*, no unify, no
> AFR; only storage/posix) GlusterFS volume last week seemed fast and
> trouble-free.  If anyone needs NFS reexport and doesn't need AFR, I
> haven't tested it (yet), but it's definitely worth a shot!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



--
Anand V. Avati