Re: [Gluster-devel] performance

[Anand Avati]

Chris,
 posting your volume specification files will help us tune it futher. Also,
what fuse version (kernel module) are you using?

thanks,
avati

2007/11/6, Chris Johnson <address@hidden>:
>
>       Hey all,
>
>       Running glusterfs-1.3.5 on CentOS5 on the server 4.5 on the
> server.  Ran iozone to see what the performance was.  Gluster was
> about 1ms/read slower than NFS.  Doesn't sound like much I know but
> when your reading through 800MB of medical image it adds up.
>
>       Would someone please be so kind as to give some guidance of where to
> look to tune this?  And can it even be tuned to as fast as NFS.
> Faster is better.
>
>       Thanks much.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chris Johnson               |Internet: address@hidden
> Systems Administrator       |Web:
> http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson
> NMR Center                  |Voice:    617.726.0949
> Mass. General Hospital      |FAX:      617.726.7422
> 149 (2301) 13th Street      |Experts have expert fun
> Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA |telling us things can't be done.  Piet Hein
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law.

-- Hofstadter's Law