Re: AFR load-balancing (was:Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore.)

[Anand Avati]

> patch 563 now uses "option read-node" and not "option read-schedule"
> We thought about "option read-node child1,child3" but this wont really
> be used in the sense that users would want to read either from local
> storage or all the children. But there might be a case where one of the
> sobvols might be a low end machine where we dont want to schedule
> reads. Still thinking if it is worth implementing this particular feature.


I think you should rename it to 'option read-subvolumes' just to be
consistant with the naming conventions.


avati


-- 
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law.

-- Hofstadter's Law