[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gluster-devel] Is this a valid AFR config?
From: |
DeeDee Park |
Subject: |
[Gluster-devel] Is this a valid AFR config? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:08:30 +0000 |
Basically where the AFR is on top of two unify volumes.
volume brick1-500GB
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host 192.168.1.11
option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick2-500GB
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host 192.168.1.12
option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick3-500GB
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host 192.168.1.13
option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick4-750GB
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host 192.168.1.14
option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick5-750GB
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host 192.168.1.15
option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume bricks123-1500GB type cluster/unify
subvolumes brick1-500GB brick2-500GB brick3-500GB
option scheduler alu
option namespace brick-ns
end-volumevolume bricks56-1500GB type cluster/unify
subvolumes brick4-750B-4 brick5-750GBGB
option scheduler alu
option namespace brick-ns
end-volume
volume afr
type cluster/afr
subvolumes bricks123 bricks45
end-volume
_________________________________________________________________
i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a
difference.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect
- [Gluster-devel] Is this a valid AFR config?,
DeeDee Park <=