gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] cache doesn t seem to be taken into account


From: Matthias Saou
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] cache doesn t seem to be taken into account
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:22:58 +0100

Sascha Ottolski wrote :

> Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 15:02:15 schrieb Sebastien COUPPEY:
> > Thanks,
> > and the compilation on the debian system run smoothly so I performed
> > an other test.
> >
> > The load balancing and the AFR is working fine. Howere, during the
> > copy a a huge amount of files the client crash with the following
> > error :
> >
> > ---------
> > got signal (11), printing backtrace
> > ---------
> > [0xffffe420]
> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so(afr_setdents+0x1
> >ca)[0xb7543bda]
> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/unify.so(unify_sh_ns_ge
> >tdents_cbk+0x17b)[0xb7538c2b]
> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so(afr_getdents_cbk
> >+0x208)[0xb7544418]
> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so[0xb7f0fb2c]
> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so(notify+0xb50
> >)[0xb7f109c0]
> > /usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(transport_notify+0x37)[0xb7efeba7]
> > /usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(sys_epoll_iteration+0xd7)[0xb7eff8f7
> >] /usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(poll_iteration+0x98)[0xb7efecf8]
> > [glusterfs](main+0x4a6)[0x804a906]
> > /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0)[0xb7d77450]
> > [glusterfs][0x804a3f1]
> > ---------
> >
> >
> > 1.3.8 is probably under huge development ... So I guess I will have
> > to find a work around if we use 1.3.7 in production.
> >
> > Thanks a lot matthias
> 
> just a guess, I think I've seen a similar error with a patchlevel > 628, 
> so maybe your checkout is a bit too recent? At least for me, patch-628 
> seems to run quite stable.

My rpm packages were made from the most recent TLA code on Jan. 8, so
this could be the problem with them indeed. For me, they're working
fine, but I'm not using AFR or unify.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux kernel 2.6.23.9-85.fc8
Load : 0.42 0.33 0.34




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]