[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?
From: |
Sebastien COUPPEY |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:27:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:
>
>
> Matthias Saou wrote:
>> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
>> that example, then?
>
> Just for this part:
>
> volume bricks
> type cluster/unify
> subvolumes afr1 afr2
> option scheduler rr
> option namespace brick-ns
> option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
> end-volume
>
> But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.
>
> Perhaps that example should be cleaned up? I know I was confused about it
> too.
cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my
tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.