Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[matthew zeier]

afr'd is what I meant and somewhere there should be docs on what the 
namespace is for and what happens when it's not there... suppose when I 
find time I could edit that wiki...

Sebastien COUPPEY wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:
> > Matthias Saou wrote:
> > > Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
> > > that example, then?
> > Just for this part:
> >
> > volume bricks
> >   type cluster/unify
> >   subvolumes afr1 afr2
> >   option scheduler rr
> >   option namespace brick-ns
> >   option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
> > end-volume
> >
> > But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.
> >
> > Perhaps that example should be cleaned up?  I know I was confused about it 
> > too.
>
> cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my
> tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.

--
matthew zeier | Network Engineer | Mozilla Corp. | (650)903-0800 x219