Re: [Gluster-devel] ls again

[Jordi Moles]

Hi,

yes, i realised that. The thing is... as i said... nothing has changed, 
a part from gluster version. Disk were and still are ok. Just in case... 
i performed a whole fsck of each disk, but no error was reported.

is there any other explanation for that issue?

En/na Amar S. Tumballi ha escrit:
> Hi Jordi,
>  Can you check on the backend if your disks are ok? because from posix level
> itself, you are getting EIO. (Input/Output Error)
>
> Regards,
> Amar
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Jordi Moles <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>   
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > i was about to write a new message to this list to explain my new
> > experiencies with "the ls problem".
> >
> > This morning i updated both fuse and glusterfs to the latest tla versions,
> > i used to have mainline2.5-patch 690, now i've got patch 736.
> >
> > The thing is that i used to have "ls slow" commands when there was "some"
> > activity in the filesystem.
> >
> > But with today's update, the system is even slowler, with an empty
> > filesystem, with no activity at all.... ls is really really slow.
> >
> > is that normal?
> >
> > these are extracts from my log files:
> >
> > postfix-client
> > ***************
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
> > 5
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> > 483446: (34) /dummymassiu2/new/
> > 1207584588.V12I1e6810M24355.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1312 => -1 (5)
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
> > 5
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> > 483450: (34) /dummymassiu2/new/
> > 1207584588.V12I1e6810M24355.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1312 => -1 (5)
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
> > 5
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> > 483784: (34) /dummymassiu6/new/
> > 1207584588.V12I124a4aM313591.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1313 => -1 (5)
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
> > 5
> > 2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> > 483788: (34) /dummymassiu6/new/
> > 1207584588.V12I124a4aM313591.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1313 => -1 (5)
> > ***************
> >
> > nodes
> > ***************
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:29 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:29 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/
> > 1207584613.V12I124a4aM742789.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1312:
> > Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:29 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu2/new/
> > 1207584622.V12I1e6810M709269.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
> > Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu2/new/
> > 1207584622.V12I1e6810M709269.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
> > Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/
> > 1207584610.V12I124a51M867739.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
> > Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/
> > 1207584616.V12I124a52M181177.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1311:
> > Input/output error
> > 2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
> > /dummymassiu6/new/
> > 1207584610.V12I124a51M867739.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
> > Input/output error
> > ***************
> >
> > Nothing a part from the glusterfs version has changed... i mean... conf
> > files are the same.... same machines.... and so on.....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > En/na Reinis Rozitis ha escrit:
> >
> >  ls commands on modern GNU/Linux systems run xattr calls on each entry for
> >     
> > > > >           
> > > > ACL purposes. This can turn out to be pretty expensive in terms of
> > > >         
> > > performance.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > thats what I thought of. Maybe worth to add to the FAQ or some other
> > > docs so
> > > it doesnt turn out as WTF - factor.
> > >
> > > rr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >
> > >
> > >       
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> >     
>
>
>
>