gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question about Glusterfs


From: Amar S. Tumballi
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Question about Glusterfs
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:45:53 -0700

Hi Antonio,
 Client side unify is simple and easier approach in my opinion. But
depending on how your i/o pattern is, how your network topology is, you may
want to change it. but to start with, unify on client side is a better
approach.

Regards,
Amar

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Antonio González <
address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I try to think about a GlusterFS file system, where we have a lot of
> servers
> and clients. In my firsts test I place the unify translator in a central
> server, because I think that is more scalable that a schema where the
> unify
> translator were in the client, because it would necessary that the clients
> knows the bricks exported in the full system.
>
>
>
> What schema is better, a central unify or a unify client…??
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Supercomputing and Superstorage!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]