[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution
From: |
Daniel Maher |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:46:17 +0200 |
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:39:42 +0100 (BST) address@hidden wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Joey Novak wrote:
>
> > > As for AFR, the client takes care of the work.
> > servers are essentially just network
> > accessible file systems, that aren't aware of each other, and thus,
> > don't replicate between each others at all.
>
> So for n mirrored servers, the client bandwidth increases n-fold?
> That's quite shocking...
Yes, it is quite shocking - and doesn't make much sense to me, either.
Instead, you can have the servers be responsible for AFR, and let the
clients be unaware of each other. This solves the n-fold bandwidth
issue entirely (and seems more "normal").
--
Daniel Maher <dma AT witbe.net>
- [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Gordan Bobic, 2008/04/17
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Joey Novak, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, gordan, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution,
Daniel Maher <=
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, gordan, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Reinis Rozitis, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Samuel Douglas, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Gordan Bobic, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Samuel Douglas, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Gordan Bobic, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Reinis Rozitis, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Splitbrain Resolution, Gordan Bobic, 2008/04/18