[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify
|
From: |
Alain Baeckeroot |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify |
|
Date: |
Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:04:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Le samedi 26 avril 2008, Gareth Bult a écrit :
> Technically, if you have local storage on each node then GlusterFS/Unify is a
> useful solution, but the performance overhead compared to local storeage can
> be notable.
>
Are there some benchmrks available about this ?
Regards
Alain Baeckeroot
- [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Alsan Wong, 2008/04/25
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Gareth Bult, 2008/04/25
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Alsan Wong, 2008/04/25
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Gareth Bult, 2008/04/25
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Alsan Wong, 2008/04/25
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Gareth Bult, 2008/04/26
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Does gluster suit my need?, Alsan Wong, 2008/04/26
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify,
Alain Baeckeroot <=
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify, Gareth Bult, 2008/04/27
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify, Brandon Lamb, 2008/04/27
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify, Amar S. Tumballi, 2008/04/28