[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gluster-devel] Can I get scale-up performance by the stripe xlator?
|
From: |
周永豪 |
|
Subject: |
[Gluster-devel] Can I get scale-up performance by the stripe xlator? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 2008 22:34:09 +0800 |
hi,can I use the stripe xlator to improve the read/write performance? e.g. use
3 nodes working in a stripe-xlator, can I get a 3 fold benchmark result?
Or anyone thought about the parallel I/O improvement in the HPC application?
i.e. make the performance scale-up due to the node increasing?
BTW: there is a bug report. When try to add a sample xlator into
glusterfs-1.3.9, my teammate found a bug in SuperFastHash function, hashfn.c at
line 49, the codes below are dummy codes.
uint32_t SuperFastHash (const char * data, int32_t len) {
//...
for (;len > 0; len--) {
hash ^= data[len];
return hash;
}
//...never get invoking...
In the test, we found a terrible hash collision, maybe some fixup?
Best Wishes～
Yonghao Zhou
2008-05-21
From： address@hidden
Send Time： 2008-05-21 00:19:37
To： address@hidden
CC：
Sub： Gluster-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 73
Send Gluster-devel mailing list submissions to
address@hidden
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden
You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gluster-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Single-process (server and client) AFR problems
(address@hidden)
2. Re: Single-process (server and client) AFR problems
(Krishna Srinivas)
3. Re: Single-process (server and client) AFR problems
(address@hidden)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:21:34 +0100 (BST)
From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Single-process (server and client) AFR
problems
To: address@hidden
Message-ID:
<address@hidden >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Krishna,
Is that to say that it's a bug, or am I just using it wrong? Or do I just
have a knack for finding dodgy edge cases?
Is there a workaround?
I have just reconfigured my servers to do 2-process client-side AFR (i.e.
the traditional approach), and that works fine. But having single-process
server-side AFR would be more efficient, and simplify my config somewhat.
Thanks.
Gordan
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Krishna Srinivas wrote:
> In this setup, home1 is sending CHILD_UP event to "server" xlator instead
> of the "home" afr xlator. (and home2 is not up) This makes afr think none
> of its subvols are up. We will fix it to handle this situation.
>
> Thanks
> Krishna
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Gordan Bobic <address@hidden > wrote:
> This is with release 1.3.9.
>
> Not much more that seems relevant turns up in the logs with -L DEBUG
> (DNS
> chatter, mentions that the 2nd server isn't talking (glusterfs is
> switched
> off on it because that causes the lock-up).
>
> This gets logged when I try to cat ~/.bashrc:
>
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [fuse-bridge.c:375:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> 39: (34) /gordan/.bashrc = >
> ?0166157
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [inode.c:577:__create_inode] fuse/inode: create
> inode(60166157)
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [inode.c:367:__active_inode] fuse/inode:
> activating
> inode(60166157), lru=7/102
> 4
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [inode.c:367:__active_inode] fuse/inode:
> activating
> inode(60166157), lru=7/102
> 4
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [fuse-bridge.c:1517:fuse_open] glusterfs-fuse: 40:
> OPEN /gordan/.bashrc
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 E [afr.c:1985:afr_selfheal] home: none of the
> children
> are up for locking, retur
> ning EIO
> 2008-05-20 09:14:08 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: 40:
> (12) /gordan/.bashrc = > -1
> ?5)
>
> On the command line, I get back "Input/output error". I can ls the files,
> but cannot actually read them.
>
> This is with only the first server up. Same happens when I mount home.vol
> via fstab or via something like:
> glusterfs -f /etc/glusterfs/home.vol /home
>
> I have also reduced the config (single process, intended for servers) to a
> bare minimum (removed posix lock layer), to get to the bottom of it, but I
> cannot get any reads to work:
>
> volume home1
> ???�type storage/posix
> ???�option directory /gluster/home
> end-volume
>
> volume home2
> ???�type protocol/client
> ???�option transport-type tcp/client
> ???�option remote-host 192.168.3.1
> ???�option remote-subvolume home2
> end-volume
>
> volume home
> ???�type cluster/afr
> ???�option read-subvolume home1
> ???�subvolumes home1 home2
> end-volume
>
> volume server
> ???�type protocol/server
> ???�option transport-type tcp/server
> ???�subvolumes home home1
> ???�option auth.ip.home.allow 127.0.0.1,192.168.*
> ???�option auth.ip.home1.allow 127.0.0.1,192.168.*
> end-volume
>
> On a related node, if single-process is used, how does GlusterFS know which
> volume to mount? For example, if it is trying to mount the protocol/client
> volume (home2), the obviously, that won't work because the 2nd server is
> not up. If it is mounting the protocol/server volume, then is it trying to
> mount home or home1? Or does it mount the outermost volume that _isn't_ a
> protocol/[client|server] (which is "home" in this case)?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gordan
>
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:18:07 +0530, Krishna Srinivas
> <address@hidden > wrote:
> > Gordan,
> >
> > Which patch set is this? Can you run glusterfs server side with "-L
> DEBUG"
> > and send the logs?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Krishna
> >
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Gordan Bobic <address@hidden > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm having rather major problems getting single-process AFR to work
> > between
> > > two servers. When both servers come up, the GlusterFS on both locks up
> > > pretty solid. The processes that try to access the FS (including ls)
> > seem to
> > > get nowhere for a few minutes, and then complete. But something gets
> > stuck,
> > > and glusterfs cannot be killed even with -9!
> > >
> > > Another worrying thing is that fuse kernel module ends up having a
> > reference
> > > count even after glusterfs process gets killed (sometimes killing the
> > remote
> > > process that isn't locked up on it's host can break the locked-up
> > operations
> > > and allow for the local glusterfs process to be killed). So fuse then
> > cannot
> > > be unloaded.
> > >
> > > This error seems to come up in the logs all the time:
> > > 2008-05-19 20:57:17 E [afr.c:1985:afr_selfheal] home: none of the
> > children
> > > are up for locking, returning EIO
> > > 2008-05-19 20:57:17 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> > 63:
> > > (12) /test = > -1 (5)
> > >
> > > This implies come kind of a locking issue, but the same error and
> > conditions
> > > also arise when posix locking module is removed.
> > >
> > > The configs for the two servers are attached. They are almost identical
> > to
> > > the examples on the glusterfs wiki:
> > >
> > > http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/AFR_single_process
> > >
> > > What am I doing wrong? Have I run into another bug?
> > >
> > > Gordan
> > >
> > > volume home1-store
> > > ???�type storage/posix
> > > ???�option directory /gluster/home
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home1
> > > ???�type features/posix-locks
> > > ???�subvolumes home1-store
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home2
> > > ???�type protocol/client
> > > ???�option transport-type tcp/client
> > > ???�option remote-host 192.168.3.1
> > > ???�option remote-subvolume home2
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home
> > > ???�type cluster/afr
> > > ???�option read-subvolume home1
> > > ???�subvolumes home1 home2
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume server
> > > ???�type protocol/server
> > > ???�option transport-type tcp/server
> > > ???�subvolumes home home1
> > > ???�option auth.ip.home.allow 127.0.0.1
> > > ???�option auth.ip.home1.allow 192.168.*
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home2-store
> > > ???�type storage/posix
> > > ???�option directory /gluster/home
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home2
> > > ???�type features/posix-locks
> > > ???�subvolumes home2-store
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home1
> > > ???�type protocol/client
> > > ???�option transport-type tcp/client
> > > ???�option remote-host 192.168.0.1
> > > ???�option remote-subvolume home1
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume home
> > > ???�type cluster/afr
> > > ???�option read-subvolume home2
> > > ???�subvolumes home1 home2
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > volume server
> > > ???�type protocol/server
> > > ???�option transport-type tcp/server
> > > ???�subvolumes home home2
> > > ???�option auth.ip.home.allow 127.0.0.1
> > > ???�option auth.ip.home2.allow 192.168.*
> > > end-volume
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:29:58 +0530
From: "Krishna Srinivas" <address@hidden >
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Single-process (server and client) AFR
problems
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID:
<address@hidden >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Gordon,
It is a bug in the way xlators notify UP/DOWN status to other xlators.
Thanks for notifying it to us :)
Workaround is having a separate process for "protocol/server" xlator.
Krishna
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:51 PM, <address@hidden > wrote:
> Krishna,
>
> Is that to say that it's a bug, or am I just using it wrong? Or do I just
> have a knack for finding dodgy edge cases?
>
> Is there a workaround?
>
> I have just reconfigured my servers to do 2-process client-side AFR (i.e.
> the traditional approach), and that works fine. But having single-process
> server-side AFR would be more efficient, and simplify my config somewhat.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gordan
>
>
> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Krishna Srinivas wrote:
>
> In this setup, home1 is sending CHILD_UP event to "server" xlator instead
> > of the "home" afr xlator. (and home2 is not up) This makes afr think none
> > of its subvols are up. We will fix it to handle this situation.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Krishna
> >
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Gordan Bobic <address@hidden > wrote:
> > This is with release 1.3.9.
> >
> > Not much more that seems relevant turns up in the logs with -L DEBUG
> > (DNS
> > chatter, mentions that the 2nd server isn't talking (glusterfs is
> > switched
> > off on it because that causes the lock-up).
> >
> > This gets logged when I try to cat ~/.bashrc:
> >
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [fuse-bridge.c:375:fuse_entry_cbk]
> > glusterfs-fuse:
> > 39: (34) /gordan/.bashrc = >
> > 60166157
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [inode.c:577:__create_inode] fuse/inode: create
> > inode(60166157)
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [inode.c:367:__active_inode] fuse/inode:
> > activating
> > inode(60166157), lru=7/102
> > 4
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [inode.c:367:__active_inode] fuse/inode:
> > activating
> > inode(60166157), lru=7/102
> > 4
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 D [fuse-bridge.c:1517:fuse_open] glusterfs-fuse:
> > 40:
> > OPEN /gordan/.bashrc
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 E [afr.c:1985:afr_selfheal] home: none of the
> > children
> > are up for locking, retur
> > ning EIO
> > 2008-05-20 09:14:08 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: 40:
> > (12) /gordan/.bashrc = > -1
> > (5)
> >
> > On the command line, I get back "Input/output error". I can ls the files,
> > but cannot actually read them.
> >
> > This is with only the first server up. Same happens when I mount home.vol
> > via fstab or via something like:
> > glusterfs -f /etc/glusterfs/home.vol /home
> >
> > I have also reduced the config (single process, intended for servers) to a
> > bare minimum (removed posix lock layer), to get to the bottom of it, but I
> > cannot get any reads to work:
> >
> > volume home1
> > type storage/posix
> > option directory /gluster/home
> > end-volume
> >
> > volume home2
> > type protocol/client
> > option transport-type tcp/client
> > option remote-host 192.168.3.1
> > option remote-subvolume home2
> > end-volume
> >
> > volume home
> > type cluster/afr
> > option read-subvolume home1
> > subvolumes home1 home2
> > end-volume
> >
> > volume server
> > type protocol/server
> > option transport-type tcp/server
> > subvolumes home home1
> > option auth.ip.home.allow 127.0.0.1,192.168.*
> > option auth.ip.home1.allow 127.0.0.1,192.168.*
> > end-volume
> >
> > On a related node, if single-process is used, how does GlusterFS know
> > which
> > volume to mount? For example, if it is trying to mount the protocol/client
> > volume (home2), the obviously, that won't work because the 2nd server is
> > not up. If it is mounting the protocol/server volume, then is it trying to
> > mount home or home1? Or does it mount the outermost volume that _isn't_ a
> > protocol/[client|server] (which is "home" in this case)?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Gordan
> >
> > On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:18:07 +0530, Krishna Srinivas
> > <address@hidden > wrote:
> > > Gordan,
> > >
> > > Which patch set is this? Can you run glusterfs server side with "-L
> > DEBUG"
> > > and send the logs?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Krishna
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Gordan Bobic <address@hidden >
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having rather major problems getting single-process AFR to work
> > > between
> > > > two servers. When both servers come up, the GlusterFS on both locks up
> > > > pretty solid. The processes that try to access the FS (including ls)
> > > seem to
> > > > get nowhere for a few minutes, and then complete. But something gets
> > > stuck,
> > > > and glusterfs cannot be killed even with -9!
> > > >
> > > > Another worrying thing is that fuse kernel module ends up having a
> > > reference
> > > > count even after glusterfs process gets killed (sometimes killing the
> > > remote
> > > > process that isn't locked up on it's host can break the locked-up
> > > operations
> > > > and allow for the local glusterfs process to be killed). So fuse then
> > > cannot
> > > > be unloaded.
> > > >
> > > > This error seems to come up in the logs all the time:
> > > > 2008-05-19 20:57:17 E [afr.c:1985:afr_selfheal] home: none of the
> > > children
> > > > are up for locking, returning EIO
> > > > 2008-05-19 20:57:17 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> > > 63:
> > > > (12) /test = > -1 (5)
> > > >
> > > > This implies come kind of a locking issue, but the same error and
> > > conditions
> > > > also arise when posix locking module is removed.
> > > >
> > > > The configs for the two servers are attached. They are almost identical
> > > to
> > > > the examples on the glusterfs wiki:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/AFR_single_process
> > > >
> > > > What am I doing wrong? Have I run into another bug?
> > > >
> > > > Gordan
> > > >
> > > > volume home1-store
> > > > type storage/posix
> > > > option directory /gluster/home
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home1
> > > > type features/posix-locks
> > > > subvolumes home1-store
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home2
> > > > type protocol/client
> > > > option transport-type tcp/client
> > > > option remote-host 192.168.3.1
> > > > option remote-subvolume home2
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home
> > > > type cluster/afr
> > > > option read-subvolume home1
> > > > subvolumes home1 home2
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume server
> > > > type protocol/server
> > > > option transport-type tcp/server
> > > > subvolumes home home1
> > > > option auth.ip.home.allow 127.0.0.1
> > > > option auth.ip.home1.allow 192.168.*
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home2-store
> > > > type storage/posix
> > > > option directory /gluster/home
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home2
> > > > type features/posix-locks
> > > > subvolumes home2-store
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home1
> > > > type protocol/client
> > > > option transport-type tcp/client
> > > > option remote-host 192.168.0.1
> > > > option remote-subvolume home1
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume home
> > > > type cluster/afr
> > > > option read-subvolume home2
> > > > subvolumes home1 home2
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > volume server
> > > > type protocol/server
> > > > option transport-type tcp/server
> > > > subvolumes home home2
> > > > option auth.ip.home.allow 127.0.0.1
> > > > option auth.ip.home2.allow 192.168.*
> > > > end-volume
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:43:11 +0100 (BST)
From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Single-process (server and client) AFR
problems
To: address@hidden
Message-ID:
<address@hidden >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Krishna Srinivas wrote:
> It is a bug in the way xlators notify UP/DOWN status to other xlators.
Ah, OK. I thought I was doing something wrong.
> Thanks for notifying it to us :)
No problem, glad I could help. :)
Is it likely to make it into release 1.3.10?
> Workaround is having a separate process for "protocol/server" xlator.
Thanks. I split it all up back to client-side AFR. It works, but I think
the way I was trying to use it would be more efficient for my setup.
Gordan
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
End of Gluster-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 73
*********************************************
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Gluster-devel] Can I get scale-up performance by the stripe xlator?,
周永豪 <=