Re: [Gluster-devel] is it a bug? (unify+rr)

[Yi Ling]

2009/7/31, Raghavendra G <address@hidden>:

Hi,



On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Yi Ling<lingyi.pro@gmail.com> wrote:
> there are 3 servers and a client in my clustered system. there are 2
> exported directories on each server, one for storage,the other for
> namespace. volume files for both servers and client are as follow.
>
> after all servers and client connecting sucessfully, i stop server 1. when i
> simply run 'ls' on mount point of the client, my computer (where client is
> running ) hang without any response to keyboard and mouse.  is that a
> failure of a single point ??

Is the namespace is on server1? in that case you should get a
"Transport Endpoint not connected" within (2 * transport-timeout)
seconds.

transport-timeout is configured in client-protocol.

>
> im gussing it's a bug.   anybody could tell why? thank you ~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>



--
Raghavendra G

 

in my sheme, each server has a namespace volume. in the client volume file, i make a afr translator attach to them. the volume file of client is as follow:

################volfile begins#####################
 volume client1
        type protocol/client
        option transport-type tcp/client
        option remote-host 192.168.1.11
        option remote-port 6996
        option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume

volume client1-ns
        type protocol/client
        option transport-type tcp/client
        option remote-host 192.168.1.11
        option remote-port 6996
        option remote-subvolume brick-ns
end-volume

volume client2
        type protocol/client
        option transport-type tcp/client
        option remote-host 192.168.1.12
        option remote-port 6996
        option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume

volume client2-ns
        type protocol/client
        option transport-type tcp/client
        option remote-host 192.168.1.12
        option remote-port 6996
        option remote-subvolume brick-ns
end-volume

volume client3
        type protocol/client
        option transport-type tcp/client
        option remote-host 192.168.1.13
        option remote-port 6996
        option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume

volume client3-ns
        type protocol/client
        option transport-type tcp/client
        option remote-host 192.168.1.13
        option remote-port 6996
        option remote-subvolume brick-ns
end-volume

volume clients-ns
        type cluster/afr
        subvolumes client1-ns client2-ns client3-ns
end-volume

volume unify
        type cluster/unify
        subvolumes client1 client2 client3
        option namespace clients-ns
        option scheduler rr
end-volume

################volfile ends#####################

i don't think it is wrong ~~~ if wrong, correct me~~~ thanks~~~