Re: [Gluster-devel] inodes

[Emmanuel Dreyfus]

Amar Tumballi <address@hidden> wrote:

> http://review.gluster.com/613 <--- for distribute itransform removing.

> With rebalance feature to be done inside distribute, most of the
> other fixes which went in only in master branch are also backported
>
> as part of rebalance, more syncops are added.

That one is huge. It brings ino fixes along with a lot of other changes.
Should I just extract the inode relevant part? Or is the whole change
self-contained (I mean not dependent on other changes) and will only
bring benefits?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
address@hidden