[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] inodes and AFR

From: Anand Avati
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] inodes and AFR
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:20:26 +0530

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:15:49PM +0530, Anand Avati wrote:
>> You need not worry as long as the numbers are stable.
> I am not sure they are stable when bricks are added: it cause a ESTALL,
> which is recovered on the next attempt, but still, I suspect there is
> something wrong. Are brick addition supposed to run without any hitch
> for clients?

Yes, that was the very intention of making the inode number a
derivation of the GFID instead of the backend inode number, so that
brick addition/replacement does not impact its stability.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]