On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus
<address@hidden> wrote:
Hi
Test case: calling getcwd(3) in a directory on NetBSD
- glusterfs release-3.3 has no problem
- glusterfs 3.2.7 has a funny bug when a node TTL is expired *and* if
the getcwd program is stored in the glusterfs volume.
# cd /gfs/manu/bugB4 && /gfs/manu/getcwd/getcwd && sleep 2 && \
/gfs/manu/getcwd/getcwd
getcwd = "/gfs/manu/bugB4"
getcwd = "(null)"
# cd /gfs/manu/bugB4 && /tmp/getcwd && sleep 2 && /tmp/getcwd
getcwd = "/gfs/manu/bugB4"
getcwd = "/gfs/manu/bugB4"
When it fails the client logs say:
[2012-08-09 06:45:37.338851] W [inode.c:180:__foreach_ancestor_dentry]
0-: per dentry fn returned 1
[2012-08-09 06:45:37.339021] C [inode.c:232:__is_dentry_cyclic]
0-gfs/inode: detected cyclic loop formation during inode linkage.
inode (-5514238854638478444/20958215-feaa-4648-acde-5f3e8da776e5) l
linking under itself as ..
[2012-08-09 06:45:37.339112] W [inode.c:844:inode_lookup] 0-: inode
not found
Is that a bug in glusterfs 3.2.7 or an inaccuracy in NetBSD FUSE? Here
is getcwd sources for anyone willing to test:
/* cc -o getcwd getcwd.c */
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
int
main(void)
{
char buf[MAXPATHLEN + 1];
(void)printf("getcwd = \"%s\"\n", getcwd(buf, MAXPATHLEN));
return 0;
}
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
address@hidden
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel