gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs


From: Kaleb Keithley
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:46:31 -0400 (EDT)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Kaleb Keithley" <address@hidden>
>From: "Joe Julian" <address@hidden>
>>
>> If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think 
>> it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms. 
>
>Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---
>
>When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I don't think 
>we know, do we?
>
>And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to glusterfs?
>
>In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of extra RPMs. 
>Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a convenient way.
>
>Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a heartbeat 
>because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at that point.
>

And, in case it wasn't apparent, this proposed packaging of extra RPMs only 
applies only to f18 and f19/rawhide. (And eventually in my fedorapeople.org 
repo for f16, f17, el5, and el6.)

If we're lucky, maybe we'd be able to drop the extra RPMs by the time f18 
ships, and very probably, if not definitely, by the time f19 ships.

--

Kaleb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]