|
From: | Yin Yin |
Subject: | Re: [Gluster-devel] question on glusterfs kvm performance |
Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:44:21 +0800 |
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Yin Yin <address@hidden> wrote:With no FUSE overhead, IO path becomes simpler with no back and forth
> Bharata B Rao :
> Thanks!! This is what I wanted!
> I'll try your patch and make some test.
> BTW: why gluster-qemu integration had so high performance than fuse
> mount?
transition to kernel.
Regards,
Bharata.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |