gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gluster-devel] QEMU with GlusterFS backend segfaults when running FIO


From: Bharata B Rao
Subject: [Gluster-devel] QEMU with GlusterFS backend segfaults when running FIO
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:16:57 +0530

Hi,

With GlusterFS block backend in QEMU, running FIO from inside VM
causes a segfault like this...

(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff5ff03e8 in __memcpy_ssse3_back () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007fffeb95cd5e in iov_unload (buf=0x7fffeaeec000 "",
vector=0x7fff24001610, count=1)
    at ../../../../libglusterfs/src/common-utils.h:343
#2  0x00007fffeb95f1c1 in __wb_collapse_small_writes
(holder=0x7fff08001c40, req=
    0x7fff24001c70) at write-behind.c:903
#3  0x00007fffeb95f427 in __wb_preprocess_winds (wb_inode=0x7fff14000a10)
    at write-behind.c:979
#4  0x00007fffeb95f6e5 in wb_process_queue (wb_inode=0x7fff14000a10)
at write-behind.c:1064
#5  0x00007fffeb95fbbe in wb_writev (frame=0x5555565cdac4,
this=0x7fffd4003e80, fd=
    0x555556b55d6c, vector=0x555559e15180, count=1, offset=2493120512,
flags=0, iobref=
    0x7fff240014c0, xdata=0x0) at write-behind.c:1160
#6  0x00007fffeb75394b in ra_writev (frame=0x5555565d2cbc,
this=0x7fffd40049e0, fd=
    0x555556b55d6c, vector=0x555559e15180, count=1, offset=2493120512,
flags=0, iobref=
    0x7fff240014c0, xdata=0x0) at read-ahead.c:682
#7  0x00007fffeb5429c9 in ioc_writev (frame=0x5555565cd564,
this=0x7fffd4005380, fd=
    0x555556b55d6c, vector=0x555559e15180, count=1, offset=2493120512,
flags=0, iobref=
    0x7fff240014c0, xdata=0x0) at io-cache.c:1250
#8  0x00007fffeb328c78 in qr_writev (frame=0x5555565cdecc,
this=0x7fffd4005e30, fd=
    0x555556b55d6c, vector=0x555559e15180, count=1, off=2493120512,
wr_flags=0, iobref=
    0x7fff240014c0, xdata=0x0) at quick-read.c:1525
#9  0x00007fffeb11925f in mdc_writev (frame=0x5555565ce17c,
this=0x7fffd4006880, fd=
    0x555556b55d6c, vector=0x555559e15180, count=1, offset=2493120512,
flags=0, iobref=
    0x7fff240014c0, xdata=0x0) at md-cache.c:1420
#10 0x00007fffeaf0789b in io_stats_writev (frame=0x5555565cd96c,
this=0x7fffd40072d0, fd=
    0x555556b55d6c, vector=0x555559e15180, count=1, offset=2493120512,
flags=0, iobref=
    0x7fff240014c0, xdata=0x0) at io-stats.c:2091
#11 0x00007ffff5c79ed0 in syncop_writev (subvol=0x7fffd40072d0,
fd=0x555556b55d6c, vector=
    0x555559e15180, count=1, offset=2493120512, iobref=0x7fff240014c0, flags=0)
    at syncop.c:1096
#12 0x00007ffff72ac51e in glfs_pwritev (glfd=0x555556b6ef50,
iovec=0x5555565691e0, iovcnt=
    6, offset=2493120512, flags=0) at glfs-fops.c:543
#13 0x00007ffff72ac04c in glfs_io_async_task (data=0x555556a1e660) at
glfs-fops.c:396
#14 0x00007ffff5c732ab in synctask_wrap (old_task=0x5555571145e0) at
syncop.c:125
#15 0x00007ffff5ef0360 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

git bisect points to

commit c903de38da917239fe905fc6efa1f413d120fc04
Author: Anand Avati <address@hidden>
Date:   Thu Sep 13 22:26:59 2012 -0700

    write-behind: implement causal ordering and other cleanup

I hadn't seen this earlier since I had resorted to
performance.write-behind=off setting for my test volume.

Regards,
Bharata.
-- 
http://bharata.sulekha.com/blog/posts.htm, http://raobharata.wordpress.com/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]