Eco reported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=763897,
something I've been complaining about for some time and thought I'd
also filed a bug on (but apparently I didn't). Pranith misunderstood
the bug and closed it.
The bug is about setting the first host's name from itself. The
current method of setting the first host's name from the second
seems like a horrible kludge and is a hindrance to automated
installs.
Attempting to set a server's own hostname through peer probe
responds, "Probe on localhost not needed". There should be a way of
doing this.
So should I clone that and add my comments, or should somebody
reopen it?