gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gluster-devel] opendir/readdir helper


From: Jeff Darcy
Subject: [Gluster-devel] opendir/readdir helper
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:27:22 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2

As we all know, directory-listing performance (or lack thereof) is a bit of a sore spot for many GlusterFS users, because it's one of the few places where FUSE really does make a difference. It will probably always be a sore spot even with the readdirp changes that are already under way. The next step would be to add a FUSE enhancement to "inject" directory entries before they're requested, but that's a lot of work for an uncertain outcome. The FUSE haters among the kernel leadership would probably reject such changes without serious consideration, and even if I'm wrong about that it's likely to be a long time before they make it into the various distributions (not to mention non-Linux platform issues).

So, let's think outside the box for a bit. What about an LD_PRELOAD helper? Believe me, I know all about the problems with LD_PRELOAD, but I still can't think of any reasonable use case that requires readdir to work across a fork (for example). The basic idea is that the LD_PRELOAD would catch calls to opendir/readdir and match them against paths matching GlusterFS volumes. If a match is found, then it would use libgfapi to serve the results, without any FUSE involvement and with massive prefetching goodness etc. Without a match, the helper would naturally fall back to the system functions.

I suspect that this approach would make listings on very large single directories many times faster than would ever be possible with FUSE. For deeply nested directories we'd need to add some more complexity so that we're not going through the whole connection-establishment path (including authentication etc.) for each directory separately, but that's all pretty well understood pain for pretty obvious gain.

Any other thoughts?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]