|
On 09.01.2014 04:15, Justin Clift
wrote:
Ahhh, this is probably due to the updated OpenSSL stuff in EL 6.5.
Yes...
Maybe we need to do separate sets of RPMs for EL 6.0-6.4, and
a different set for 6.5 onwards.
It would seem, this is how things were done with the previous
release (3.4.1-2). I wonder, what changed -- and whether it can be
undone or otherwise corrected...
It is certainly disappointing to download RPMs from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.2/RHEL/epel-6.4/x86_64/
and see them fail to install on RHEL-6.4 -- because they were, in
fact, neither made on RHEL-6.4, nor tested on RHEL-6.4 :-(
-mi
|