[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Speed gains from libgfapi
From: |
Brad Childs |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Speed gains from libgfapi |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:06:15 -0500 (EST) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vijay Bellur" <address@hidden>
> To: "Brad Childs" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 5:34:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Speed gains from libgfapi
>
> On 02/07/2014 05:43 AM, Brad Childs wrote:
> > Has anyone gone from using FUSE to libgfapi? How much did performance
> > increase/decrease?
> >
> > I'm working on some libgfapi code and it is slower then my FUSE based
> > solution, so I suspect something is wrong. I would like to know what kind
> > of speed increase others see so I know what to expect.
> >
> >
>
> What operations do you find to be slower in libgfapi than FUSE?
>
> -Vijay
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
Well I don't have specific operations-- I'm implementing JNI/Java bindings,
and both reads/writes are slower than raw FUSE writes. My suspicion is its in
the buffering/memory between java/C but I'm still investigating.
Thanks for the response i'll keep you updated!
-bc