[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes
|
From: |
Niels de Vos |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:55:55 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:21:10AM -0500, James wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Niels de Vos <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 1. glusterfs-server (glusterd) and glusterfs-geo-replication depend on
> > each other. It is not possible to install glusterfs-server without
> > glusterfs-geo-replication, or the other way around.
>
> The only question I would have is why does glusterfs-server, depend on
> geo-replication?
It seems that this is not the case for all releases. Current releases do
not have the dependency. There have been releases where glusterd (from
glusterfs-server) would not start in case glusterfs-geo-replication was
not installed.
Obviously the associated bug [1] that I filed for merging these two
packages is now closed as NOTABUG, and the review request [2] for the
modified .spec file has been abandoned.
In case glusterd has trouble starting without geo-replication installed,
a new bug will need to be filed and we'll reconsider the merging of
glusterfs-server and glusterfs-geo-replication again.
Sorry for the noise,
Niels
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065383
2. http://review.gluster.org/7013