Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfs-3.5.0beta4 released

[Emmanuel Dreyfus]

Emmanuel Dreyfus <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Do not observe any fixes related to memory leaks. Would it be possible
> > to get a valgrind report for the glusterfsd processes if you happen to
> > observe the leak again?
> 
> I have the answer: I made a mistake reinstalling, and I am now running
> 3.5.0qa2 instead of 3.5.0beta4

And there is another reason: I forgot the "replica 2" when I created the
volume, it was therefore not using AFR. That may help finding where the
issue is.

Now running 3.5.0beta4 on a 2x2 replicated/distributed volume. Just
unpacking a tar archive already gives an impressive result: glusterfsd
brick processes get a 1.6 GB memory footprint.

PID USER PRI NICE  SIZE  RES  STATE  TIME  WCPU CPU COMMAND
619 root      84    0  1635M 1574M select/1 33:08 2.34% 2.34% glusterfsd


-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
address@hidden