Re: [Gluster-devel] Puppet-Gluster+ThinP

[Ric Wheeler]

On 04/20/2014 05:11 PM, James wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Ric Wheeler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The amount of space you set aside is very much workload dependent (rate of
> > change, rate of deletion, rate of notifying the storage about the freed
> > space).
>  From the Puppet-Gluster perspective, this will be configurable. I
> would like to set a vaguely sensible default though, which I don't
> have at the moment.

This will require a bit of thinking as you have noticed, but let's start with 
some definitions.

The basic use case is one file system backed by an exclusive dm-thinp target (no 
other file system writing to that dm-thinp pool or contending for allocation).

The goal is to get an alert in time to intervene before things get ugly, so we 
are hoping to get a sense of rate of change in the file system and how long any 
snapshot will be retained for.

For example, if we have a 10TB file system (presented as such to the user) and 
we write say 500GB of new data/day, daily snapshots will need that space for as 
long as we retain them.  If you write much less (5GB/day), it will clearly take 
a lot less.

The above makes this all an effort to predict the future, but that is where the 
watermark alert kicks in to help us recover from a bad prediction.

Maybe we use a default of setting aside 20% of raw capacity for snapshots and 
set that watermark at 90% full?  For a lot of use people, I suspect a fairly low 
rate of change and that means pretty skinny snapshots.

We will clearly need to have a lot of effort here in helping explain this to 
users so they can make the trade off for their particular use case.

> > Keep in mind with snapshots (and thinly provisioned storage, whether using a
> > software target or thinly provisioned array) we need to issue the "discard"
> > commands down the IO stack in order to let the storage target reclaim space.
> >
> > That typically means running the fstrim command on the local file system
> > (XFS, ext4, btrfs, etc) every so often. Less typically, you can mount your
> > local file system with "-o discard" to do it inband (but that comes at a
> > performance penalty usually).
> Do you think it would make sense to have Puppet-Gluster add a cron job
> to do this operation?
> Exactly what command should run, and how often? (Again for having
> sensible defaults.)

I think that we should probably run fstrim once a day or so (hopefully late at 
night or off peak)?  Adding in Lukas who lead a lot of the discard work.

> > There is also a event mechanism to help us get notified when we hit a target
> > configurable watermark ("help, we are running short on real disk, add more
> > or clean up!").
> Can you point me to some docs about this feature?

My quick google search only shows my own very shallow talk slides, so let me dig 
around for something better :)

> > Definitely worth following up with the LVM/device mapper people on how to do
> > this best,
> >
> > Ric
> Thanks for the comments. From everyone I've talked to, it seems some
> of the answers are still in progress. The good news is, that I'm ahead
> of the curve for being ready for when this becomes more mainstream. I
> think Paul is in the same position too.
>
> James

This is all new stuff - even not with gluster on top of it - so this will mean 
hitting a few bumps I fear.  Definitely worth putting thought into this now and 
working on the documentation,

Ric